this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
739 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

60103 readers
3292 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
739
23andMe frantically changed its terms of service to prevent hacked customers from suing (www.engadget.com)
submitted 1 year ago by SeaJ@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IANAL and I don't claim to fully understand the case, but it looks to me like the reason they might be able to get away with it is that they're not trying to change anyone's rights or obligations; they are "merely" changing the mechanism by which disputes are to be resolved. It is of course a pure coincidence that the new mechanism makes it a lot harder to find 23andMe liable for any infractions.

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

I lean the other way.

I think it would be a pretty solid case to argue that the change to the TOS, considering the timing and combined with the breach, would be outrageously unreasonable enough to invalidate the “meeting of the minds” requirement.