Asklemmy

43400 readers

1038 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Why haven't corporations bribed their way through copyleft (licenses) yet? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Amicchan@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I thought companies could bribe through the legal system, so why not licenses?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ghast@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Legal questions would have to be answered on a per-country basis, since different high courts can make different rulings.

I'm not sure people 'bribe their way through' a legal system by simply paying money, then wandering off with a good ruling. Vague laws might be swayed, but having public courts mean people can't just aske for a murder charge to be dropped.

I don't know of any unambiguous GPL violation which has been left alone. Trump's social media (truth-social or something) was found to have violataed the GPL, so they'll have to release that code.