Asklemmy

43968 readers

793 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

511

Whats your such opinion (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 11 months ago by cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

1199 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

The main story of Baldur's Gate 3 is pretty bland and mediocre.

Don’t get me wrong, it’s still a phenomenal game! The companion arcs, acting and overall presentation are still next level, some sidestories are very good, and it’s great how faithfully they adapted the D&D rules. But the main story ...

Spoiler

... is pretty bare bones and has no real twists and turns along the way.

You start with a mindflayer tadpole in your head, so who do you think will be the final boss? Exactly, an elder brain.
On the way you kill 3 major henchmen, who just want power, destruction, or are confused beyond saving. None of them were particularly interesting or multi-layered (maybe Ketheric a bit). None of them could be saved, convinced to switch sides, or at least affected somehow. Aligning with them is only temporary, makes barely any difference, and absolutely no difference for the end afaik.
Most big quests end in act 3 in the same manner: Go to a place in BG and dispose of the boss character behind it all.
The revelations with the Emperor/Balduran were nice, but he was a very mysterious character for the entirety oft he game, and his decision to fight you if you side with Orpheus is just absolutely ridiculous!

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

As a long time Baldurs Gate fan... Story was NEVER a strong point in the games. Or characters even. Baldurs Gate was always in every iteration a very classical RPG story with fun gameplay attached.

No one plays Baldurs Gate the dark alliance for the story. People play it because it allowed them to experience DND mechanics in a virtual setting. The co-op was an amazing bonus.

It's also important to note that Baldurs Gate as a series, was spawned in a time where "Cookie cutter RPGs with the same aesthetic, story and near identical world" was rampant. You'd find a million games that felt like they could be set in the same world by different publishers and quite frankly they would all blurr together. Baldurs Gate is merely one of the few games of that era that managed to become a franchise.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

And that carries over from the tabletop RPGs Baldur's Gate is derived from. Rarely if ever is the overarching story that great. The fun is in the journey and interacting with characters along the way.

[–] SchizoDenji@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

RDR2 is a glorified movie with half decent gameplay.

[–] Litany@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Just curious, do you have experience completing the game as >!The Dark Urge or just a Tav/origin character? !<

I found the former elevated the "henchmen's" stories and had a very satisfying ending, whether played good or evil.