this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
2 points (53.8% liked)

World News

32075 readers
1029 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (60 children)

I'm not understanding the contradiction here. They're saying it was a spy balloon for spying but that it failed at its task. Not sure how true that is, no way for me to tell but there's no inherent paradox here.

[–] gbin@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What I understand from the context is that it was a spying device but they jammed the hell out of it while flying over the US then took it down.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

That's my point. The original poster is trying to draw a line between statements that the balloon was a spying device and later statements that it did not collect intelligence while it transited over US territory as evidence that it wasn't a spying device and that the former of those statements is therefore inherently a lie. My take, without assessing the truthfulness of the claims, is that the linked articles do not support such a conclusion. One can claim the device was for spying and that it also didn't collect intelligence without contradiction because the claim is that it failed to collect intelligence, not that it did not intend to do so in the first place.

load more comments (59 replies)