this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
471 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
3522 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Amazon's strict return-to-office policy is pushing more employees into quitting::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 128 points 11 months ago (6 children)

That's the point...

Layoffs and firings hurt stock price and needs unemployment checks.

So they make it as shitty as possible, hoping people quit instead.

Never quit your job over shit like this. Refuse and make them fire you if they care that much.

You might even get a class action for unlawful termination later, we need to start treating corporations like how they treat people.

[–] maniacal_gaff@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Never quit when a company intentionally makes your life shitty?

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Yes. Being fired means almost nothing nowadays. Worst case scenario, they fire you with cause so you can't collect unemployment. That puts you in the exact same situation as quitting. Once you decide you want to quit, just do the bare minimum while you job search.

[–] yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 21 points 11 months ago

That term makes my teeth hurt. There’s nothing “quitting” about simply performing the agreed work at the agreed wage.

Corporate attempts to phrase this as some kind of theft are disgusting.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Once you decide you want to quit, just do the bare minimum while you job search.

I actually work as keenly as possible. I really strive to leave a wound that'll sting long after I'v--- uh, I mean I really strive to leave a good impression during the (for me) year-long process of finding a good next job. For my peers, they're going to need my work to be super up-to-date because leaving them a shit-fire is a bit of a dick move and I respect my peers a lot.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

That puts you in the exact same situation as quitting.

Not if it's a constructive dismissal, like them forcing you back into the office when you're a remote employee. Well, depending on where you live of course.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If my workplace were to rescind the work from home stuff, I'd refuse to go to office and split my time between doing my actual job and shopping around for a new workplace.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's what I did and they only wanted us back two days a month. Even did the interviews on company time.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I think that's completely fair. I was hired on the basis that it'd be a full remote position, with the occasional travel (like once a year, if that). If they randomly decided to have me go twice a month, I'd probably look around too.

It'd mean that twice a month I'd have to spend 4 hours commuting, hopefully on company time, as well as find someone who could sit my dog for the day. Honestly would like to have the work pay for that too.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Yeah, until feasible, stay there. Do the absolute minimum. They want you to quit, since it makes it easier for them to avoid workers' rights legislation

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Layoffs and firings hurt stock price

Quite the opposite, stock prices generally soar after layoffs.

The severance packages show up as a line item on the quarterly report though, so if you can have some people quit then that can also be a good thing in the eyes of the executives.

The whole thing leaves a bad taste in your mouth for sure.

[–] Odelay42@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I agree with a lot of what you're saying, but unfortunately the stock price soared at amzn after layoffs. Same thing happened at my old company. Only thing the market sees is the bottom line.

Also, the people quitting are the ones with a strong enough resume to get hired elsewhere.

Quiet quitting is an excellent option if you don't care what your next job is, but the fully remote options are all getting filled quickly, and simply waiting to get fired just means you'll be job hunting later in a potentially worse market, and going back to the office anyway.

Better to move up and out than just wait to be fired, in my opinion.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

stock price soared at amzn after layoffs. Same thing happened at my old company.

Stock prices are really not correlative. If the C-suite are chasing that high, you should go while you still can.

[–] BeefPiano@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Strong disagree. It’s a lot easier to find a job when you have a job.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

Never quit your job over shit like this.

Except life's too short as it is. Martyrs are forgotten. Just go, get a better job, don't look back.

9 years and 2 days ago I clocked out of my job on a Friday, caught a plane, clocked in a new job 3000mi away on Monday. I was already working to secure the wages while my wife was showing the house.

[–] yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Refuse and make them fire you if they care that much.

Wouldn’t this still impact one’s ability to collect unemployment? In some states at least, I believe there’s a distinction between employees fired with cause versus without cause, although I admit I’m no expert on this subject.

EDIT: This article states that unemployment kicks in if the employee lost their job through no fault of their own or quit for “good cause.”

This other article states that depending on the circumstances and the state you worked in, you may be able to collect unemployment if you are fired from your job. Whether you can collect unemployment depends on the circumstances of why your employment was terminated.

Good luck arguing for refusal to return to office as a “good cause!”

[–] pokemaster787@ani.social 3 points 11 months ago

If it was part of the initial work agreement that it would be remote then almost certainly it would count.

A rapid shift in job responsibilities or expectations (such as commuting two hours a day vs. 0) can be considered as "Constructive dismissal"

Even if it wasn't part of the original hiring agreement, if it's been that way for years or you have direct emails stating it's fully remote from now on you likely have a good case.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

Think back to the pre-COVID days. If management told you that your office was closing, and that you now had to report to a different office an hour away, would you be so dismissive?

This is pretty well established as Constructive Dismissal - a material change in work conditions that makes continued employment unbearable. Depending on the details, this could be seen as a layoff (if they close the office in Texas and tell you there's a job waiting for you in Florida, that counts as a layoff)