this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
371 points (95.4% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2288 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social -5 points 11 months ago (6 children)

So who is supposed to run against Trump in 2028? Biden can’t… does he think the idea is to just kick the can down the road another 4 years?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 24 points 11 months ago

The idea is Trump kicks the can

[–] MisterCreamyShits@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

I don't disagree, but man is that guy a dead ringer for Patrick Bateman.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Newsom is just another neoliberal garbage politician

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The question wasn't who the best candidate is, It's who is supposed to run against Trump.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why, so we can 4 more years of the status quo thats killing all of us? Trump isnt the problem, hes a symptom of the problem.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't like him, it's just that I think he's the most likely candidate that we'll be stuck with.

Assuming the party doesn't just go with Manchin as a fuck you to progressives.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Biden is already the fuck you to progressives

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

You think that fat fuck is going to live another 4 years?

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Whitmer I reckon, Progressive governor of a swing state, and who knows first hand that the ultra right are fucking dangerous loons that need the hand of God brought down on them.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 2 points 11 months ago

Trump won't win the nomination in 2028, so if he's still alive and still semi-intelligable, he'll launch a third party campaign that splits the conservative vote and gives the Dems 4 more years. You saw it here first.

[–] BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social -5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Pritzker or Manchin (though I doubt the democrats would allow it) have enough crossover they could get votes from all sides.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Manchin (though I doubt the democrats would allow it)

Honestly, if he announces his candidacy for 2024, I suspect a chunk of the "You're a Trump supporter if you are even slightly dissatisfied with Biden" crowd will happily jump ship.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago

I hate Manchin so much. But I would definitely vote for him over Trump. Better an ordinary asshole grifter and a fascist grifter with his own cult.