this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
345 points (95.8% liked)

World News

38563 readers
3069 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Biden administration on Monday sent Congress an urgent warning about the need to approve tens of billions of dollars in military and economic assistance to Ukraine, saying Kyiv’s war effort to defend itself from Russia’s invasion may grind to a halt without it.

In a letter to House and Senate leaders and also released publicly, Office of Management and Budget Director Shalanda Young warned the U.S. will run out of funding to send weapons and assistance to Ukraine by the end of the year, saying that would “kneecap” Ukraine on the battlefield.

She added that the U.S. already has run out of money that it has used to prop up Ukraine’s economy, and “if Ukraine’s economy collapses, they will not be able to keep fighting, full stop.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works -4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Explain how the war in Ukraine is so important to the international community because the only ones I see care are the western countries. USA, EU, probably Australia and Canada.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

International Grain supply?

Africa in particular heavily depends on Ukrainian grain shipments, without which said countries will likely descend into scarcity induced violence, which will create yet another international migrant crisis for the western right to act like helping with is tantamount to surrendering to an invasion while swearing how totally not racist they are.

And if you think those countries would be fine if either Ukraine or Russia held those fields and ports, no they wouldn't because Russia has demonstrated it is well willing to exploit market power for political gain, meaning that unless you sign on with whatever Putin wants, you can forget about feeding your people without paying through the nose for it.

This is literally a war to protect the sovereign rights of all smaller nations, first of all to not be invaded, and second of all to chart their paths without being extorted into an expedient lane by a market share superpower holding their ability to have food hostage for political favors.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That's pretty much the only relevant international community. Those countries pretty much represent most of the world's economic and military power.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did you forget that China is the second largest economy in the world? The Middle East and OPEC has a stranglehold over the world energy. Asia is the world manufacturing hub. The west is not the only relevant international community.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Oh no, I was talking about the free world, not autocracies and slave labor states.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No matter what their governments are they are still a part of this world. And my original statement still stands.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I know what you're saying. I'm suggesting they aren't world citizens; they aren't needed to conduct most of the world's business going forward and are, for the most part, adequately addressed by a policy of isolation and containment. They grow weaker with time, more dependent on one another, and spread increasingly thin. Talking about the "Group of Friends" countries.

Your point was that such countries aren't supporting Ukraine so it's technically not accurate when I say the international community is supporting Ukraine.

My point is, of course they don't support Ukraine, they are sucking the tits of Daddy Russia, or Daddy Iran, Daddy China: such shitholes of oppression and corruption as Cuba, Venezuela, Syria, North Korea, Belarus, Laos, Zimbawe, etc. They are hypocritically united by isolationism, codependency, shared disregard of human and labor rights and legal and international norms. And therefore it is accurate to say they aren't part of the international community; how can they be part of something they want to burn down?