this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
85 points (84.0% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2092 readers
177 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

"it's absolutely tone deaf for people who benefit from their parents fame to deny said fame had anything to do with it."

That's a very specific condition that most of these actors have not fulfilled, at least that I've come across in these articles.

It seems, by and large, these actors say something along the lines of "of course having ______ as my parent benefits me, but that doesn't invalidate all of my own work."

Then there's more bullshit, narrow-minded bullying.

It's popular to bash actors right now and safe to do so, so all the bullies are pitching in.

Nobody is calling out Picasso's father or ernst Klimt for profiting off their famous relatives, it's cool to bash jack quaid or Angelina Jolie, so those are the latest targets of largely unsubstantiated, whiny bullying.

They're people, and it's shameful and hypocritical to bully them, especially without evidence of the very measure of ingratitude or narcissism you and your ilk are accusing them of.