this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13009 readers
9 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
Gaywallet@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
29
[Misleading] First misinformation susceptibility test finds 'very online' Gen Z and millennials are most vulnerable to fake news (phys.org)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by somefool@beehaw.org to c/science@beehaw.org
64 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Researchers want the public to test themselves: https://yourmist.streamlit.app/. Selecting true or false against 20 headlines gives the user a set of scores and a "resilience" ranking that compares them to the wider U.S. population. It takes less than two minutes to complete.

The paper

Edit: the article might be misrepresenting the study and its findings, so it's worth checking the paper itself. (See @realChem 's comment in the thread).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] somefool@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rounding error :)

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

100% has a margin of error in millions, or tens of, depending on interpretation.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For most purposes, a 5% margin of error is considered acceptable. Since some quick websearch estimates 336M people, if up to ~17M people are informed, you can still claim that 100% is misinformed.

(But then, if you actually know how many people are informed, your acceptable margin of error falls down considerably.)