this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
358 points (95.7% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2114 readers
77 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Djinn@lemm.ee
358
Christopher Nolan Calls Zack Snyder’s ‘Watchmen’ a Film ‘Ahead of Its Time’: It Should Have Been Released Post-‘Avengers’ (www.indiewire.com)
submitted 11 months ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/moviesandtv@lemm.ee
95 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hansl@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They’re both products of their times. The squid made sense in a time where comic books weren’t as grounded as they are today.

Also a squid makes more sense when you actually foreshadow a squid. The movie would have had to shoehorn that in through the plot and that would have been a mess.

It was cleaner. Different medium, different capabilities.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't see how foreshadowing improves anything. Ozy explaining his bizarre and horrible plan and then revealing it's already happened is a wonderful moment. Knowing it's going to happen before it does would ruin it.

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Foreshadowing the squid is well done in the comics and does not change the reveal. You should read it if you haven’t.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I've read it many times but I'm sure I missed 90% of the meaning. Just seemed like people want it to be telegraphed when I assumed the novel ending was intentionally shocking and weird.