this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
-16 points (34.6% liked)

Technology

61459 readers
4635 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gamers_Mate@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would still prefer a Delorean.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

In the reboot or in real life?

'Cause they were shit in real life. I don't think the asthmatic v6 they came with could even make it to 88mph

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

but it could be tweaked back into life and had some actually interesting features. its a shit vehicle, but it could have been more.

the cybertruck is just landfill material.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The whole reason it was used in the original was that it was already a massive joke of a car.

Looks ok but runs like shit, the gull wing doors broke all the time and leaked like a sive.

It's use in BTTF actually saved its reputation and gave it a place in people's heart's it never had before.

That was why I made the comparison. Shit car that needs a movie to make it relevant and slightly cool.

[–] muse@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Precisely. That's even why Doc Brown sees it as being stylish - he's a bit out of touch

[–] Senex@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Don't send it to the landfill! I bet you could make a few stainless steel sinks out of it.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really? That's disappointing.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I can't find a top speed figure but it did have a 0-60mph of 10.5 seconds...and that was the manual.

When equipped with a manual transmission, the DeLorean accelerated from 0 to 60 miles per hour (0 to 97 km/h) in 10.5 seconds as tested by Road & Track magazine.

So it may have made it to 88 but it would take a looooong time to get there. Certainly longer than the Libyans need to hit it with an RPG.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Even better, the original DeLorean didn't have a speedometer that went to 88mph. They had to change the gauge cluster for the movie.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

A 1975 econobox was that slow. Lol

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Yes. At least a DeLorean is a Lotus underneath, and the weak engine can be/has been solved.

[–] Gamers_Mate@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

In the reboot.

[–] Senex@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

I can confirm this. My friends neighbor had a DeLorean and it sat in the driveway covered in a tarp waiting for "parts" 98% of the time. I can count the times I saw him drive it on one hand.