this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
716 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59381 readers
4152 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 193 points 11 months ago (14 children)

And then don't ever, ever go public. Once you go public all the greedy people will insist that you install more greedy people.

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 14 points 11 months ago (8 children)

I think it’s less about going public and moreso about the people that have the ability to get to the head of that line via funds.

Why should Joe Shmoe who’s family fortune is based off mafia and cartel funds get to have say in your company? Just because of the money?

I don’t get it. I’m probably naive to facets of this process - open to hearing/learning more from more informed people

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 38 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Why should Joe Shmoe who’s family fortune is based off mafia and cartel funds get to have say in your company? Just because of the money?

Yes. Becasue it is Joe Shmoe's money that funds the company while it builds the product. Without the money, there is no product.

I think it’s less about going public

Going public is a big issue, that is how Joe Shmoe gets his payback. He is the one pushing for the IPO so they can get paid.

Once that happens, the founders lose what little control they had, the control is always with the people that supply the money in the end.

[–] wtfeweguys@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 1 points 11 months ago

The solution I’m most interested in is eliminating the friction to seed/early stage funding coming directly from interested user communities and even better would be to also draw as much of the labor pool as possible from the same group.

I think this eliminates most of the misalignments in stakeholder interest.

We already have equity crowdfunding in the states. We need more innovation in crowdfunding platforms.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)