this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
411 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

59381 readers
4029 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Oh, I fully agree the government should have full control of public roads.

They just shouldn't control my vehicle unless I've already demonstrated I cannot. It should never be a default-available thing for them to outright disable a large life investment that can quickly become a life saving device in any number of situations.

What if I am drunk camping and I'm the only adult driving a bunch of kids away from a sudden forest fire? Is the vehicle going to turn off? What if my panicked driving comes across as drunk and I'm actually sober? This entire concept is nothing but a bad idea.

[โ€“] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm saying its literally set up such that they dont care what you want or prefer with reference to YOUR car, you feel me?

A.You have to go on public roads, B. public roads and everything in them are controlled by traffic laws/the government

A+B =

C. you+your car will be controlled by same

Edit: the points i made are ok but a little salty, please disregard tone :(