this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
1172 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59197 readers
3563 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kamen@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It would if everybody votes with their wallet.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

They do. That's the problem.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I like to compare that argument to climate change. If everyone voted with their wallet to not buy/do things which are bad for the environment we would stop climate change over night.

Now think about how impossible that is and then remember, that collective effort is just as difficult as stopping people buying things which contain ads

[–] un_owen@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No it wouldn't. Corpos would just put in more effort to hide the damage. Climate change can't be stopped by individual consumers because they have no means to verify whether a product they want to buy hurts the environment.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

There are products which you can guarantee have a major negative effect on the environment yet people still purchase them. This is exactly the same as people buying games and products with ads baked in.