this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
136 points (85.8% liked)

Memes

45661 readers
1760 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tilcica@lemm.ee 33 points 11 months ago (3 children)

gotta agree with you

most cops here (slovenia) actually do help the community they serve

i remember getting pissed on reddit because someone used a slovene police officer on a horse to promote ACAB while ignoring the entire backstory of the picture which contradicted their entire post

the whole world isnt the same as the US or western europe

AND BEFORE I GET CALLED A BOOTLICKER

i support neither the ACAB movement nor the corrupt cops that try their hardest to power trip over innocent people

[–] Resonanz 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just a clarification:

You will not be called a "bootlicker" because you support think cops are there to protect you. That's something reasonable to believe.

You will be called a "bootlicker" because you are in support of the state, which defends the interest of those in power (aka. political class, "the rich," bourgeoisie, etc) and its soldiers, which are cops.

I mean no harm; I'm not calling you a "bootlicker." You are a decent human just sharing your experience. I want to bring "the other side" perspective in a friendly way. I was thinking like you until I was at the other end of their macanas for helping other decent people.

The ACAB is a widespread movement in South America and has good reasons to exist since it is adjacent to Antifa. But the overall reason to hate cops is based on the argument that I explained before in a very brief way.

Since I abide by the movement, I invite you to check it out so you can engage more deeply in the conversation. For a starter, I may interest you in:

  • The excellent channel of Philosophy Tube (that has some fascinating videos of other topics, 10/10) and her video about How Police Make Up The Law (ft. LegalEagle) or this one Violence & Protest. Her work is highly focused on going in-depth to help you understand the arguments about various positions, such as philosophical dialogs, with a bit of theatrics to keep it interesting.
  • Or if you are shorter on time and are up for some more humor, check out Thought Slime video about "All Cops are Bad" where he navigates the subject.

And sorry for not sharing other voices outside the anglosphere who cover the topic. It is just that they don't speak English, so we can't understand each other.

Take care, fellow stranger.

[–] _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You should come to terms with the fact that not everyone is an anarchist and believes that any form of the concept of a state is by itself evil.

[–] Resonanz 8 points 11 months ago

That's right. That's the reason I shared content about why we have our position.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago

Police abolition is not solely promoted by anarchists.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The ACAB movement Americanizes other countries' police forces needlessly.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

ACAB states that there are inherent problems in the concept of the police. The first "A" stands for "all", after all.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And the second "A" stands for "Are"! I like this game!!

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Some tankies claim that Sovjet, GDR, or Chinese police are/were based and still shout "ACAB", because they just dislike liberal capitalism police.

They should be reminded of the first "A".

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

In authoritarian structures, the facts are dictated by the authority, not reality. When the authority and reality come into conflict, and you choose to side with reality, you are at danger of bodily harm or death.

Many people consider life and death to be more important than what letters and words mean, so I would imagine your proposal is simply impossible at any large scale, in any place where the people more inclined towards uprisings have already been killed.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I sm not sure the concept itself is bad, though I absolutely admit that I don't know the stated concept of the police.

To me it is "uphold the rule of law", but that might just be me hoping it is that.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The critique is a bit too broad to explain simply in a lemmy post.

I can try, but keepin mind that this will not be exhaustive:

The police's job is to reinforce the current power structures and keep the people that currently are in power at the top. That has been their historical purpose, too. Dating back to the 1800s when they violently beat down strikes and workers' protests. They are always "legitimized" by "the rule of law" without adressing how legitimate the law is. Speznaz, Gestapo and the Stasi all "upheld the rule of law", but where highly immoral. The same goes for Frontex.

When the police acts immorally and/or breaks the law, the social structures most likely will prevent repercussions for those police officers. If you get beat up by police, other officers will pretty much always cover for their colleagues.

The image of the police's job being to "protect and serve" is the result of active police propaganda (so-called "Copaganda")

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I see what you are saying, and while I disagree that the concept is to reinforce the current power structures and keep the people currently in power at the top, that is the end result of upholding the rule of law.

Eh, it's mostly splitting hairs at this point anyway, the police uphold the laws as written by the people in power which usually benefits themselves.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My interpretation follows the POSIWID heuristic. ;)

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago

That is fair, I find that it can simplify too much in some cases, but eh, I am very seldom in a position of power to have to actually answer these questions, so these concepts are purely academic to me.