this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
32 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22024 readers
107 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] admiralteal@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But proving criminal intent does not require you be able to hold up a magic mirror that reflects the inner thoughts of the person's soul.

Mens rea in the law is something you can establish. Certain actions a person takes imply intent and that's adequate for the criminal justice system. This isn't being flippant; often the entire purpose of the trial is to establish the criminal intent in a case where the actual facts (actus reus) are not really in dispute.

Colorado's law is defective because it didn't require establishing mens rea. And while some kinds of crime do not require criminal intent, because this particular crime conflicts with the first amendment, the level of scrutiny on the statute is much higher.

The outcome here should be that Colorado corrects its defective law to close the loophole.

[โ€“] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I think we're in agreement. I brought up the murder analogy because it often does require intent to be proven and prosecutors do manage to find ways to prove intent in those cases. Magic mirrors are clearly not a necessity for this.