Asklemmy

43893 readers

1034 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Do you think AI is more likely to end Humanity or to end Capitalism? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I feel as of CEOs worried about the dangers of AI are equating the end of Capitalism with the end of the world, what are your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would AI end capitalism? If previous centuries told us anything, it is that in a capitalist world more productivity doesn't equate to more leasure time or better wages.

I wish I'm wrong, but I can't see any other issue than companies using AI to increase profits.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm more referring to a rogue AI with AGI deciding to end capitalism to save the world and ergo itself since it could view eliminating Capitalism easier than eliminating Humanity.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 2 points 1 year ago

Humanity will likely be over because of global warming before AGIs are a thing.