this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
167 points (81.0% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
373 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is the point though, if like the article says l, 1/5th of owners have an investment property, they could sell it and still live in the current place and have a ton of cash. or sell both and move to a cheaper city and retire. Compared to people struggling to save for a mortgage in this crazy market.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

1/5th of owners have an investment property, they could sell it and still live in the current place and have a ton of cash

That's fair, and the article goes through a few key points that I agree with. The article title is just clickbait, but annoying because it's alienating. I don't think it makes sense to write a headline based on 1/5th of that group being land speculators.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"1/5 of Homeowners Refuse to Accept the Awkward Truth: They’re Rich"

Or

"Multi-property Homeowners Refuse to Accept the Awkward Truth: They’re Rich"

Or

"Multi-property owners Refuse to Accept the Awkward Truth: They’re Rich"

Or

"Landlords and Spectors Refuse to Accept the Awkward Truth: They’re Rich"

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It made us both click on it :)