this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31833 readers
112 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't know if I am missing a point or not but I don't exactly quiet get the hype as to me, it just chrome with poor man's uBlock Origin and their own crypto in the mix.

Like how it that different from me using ether Librewolf or even Google Chromium and install uBlock Origin compare to Brave?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Guess whenever Google rolls out the update to disable tracker blocking as we currently know it, we'll be firmly able to answer this question. It's unclear to me if this will impact Brave but if it doesn't then this will show Brave was worth the hype more or less I think.

Edit: I love FF but something's just run better on chromium, I have FF as default with Brave as a back up

[โ€“] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well, what Google wants to introduce is a completely arbitrary limit to the number of filtering rules, so increasing that constant in the code should be no trouble at all.

Having said that, ad blocking effectiveness is lower on Chrome-based browsers already today: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox
Padding those flaws out or offering similar functionality to uBO in their custom ad blocker, that does take some effort.