this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
1262 points (88.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9729 readers
562 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yukichigai@kbin.social 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean what's worse: using a human shield, or deciding "nah fuck them kids shoot through them anyway."

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 45 points 11 months ago (36 children)

What if they were shooting your kids while hiding behind their own? Would you let them keep doing it while insisting that reprisals are off limits?

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 52 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, this is the problem I'm having with people picking sides. It's a giant crap-pile of the worst of humanity. People act like there's a good side. Nah, everything's a mess of generational hatred and I hate it all.

There needs to be a cease-fire. Hamas needs to release all hostages and then be permanently removed from power in Gaza, and Israel needs to help the Palestinians rebuild what has been destroyed, burry their dead with dignity and respect, and heavily compensate the families of those who have died.

The whole thing is out of control

[–] stewsters@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There was a ceasefire, then Hamas attacked. Hard to rebuild trust after that.

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That may be so, but Israel clearly has the upper hand right now. It's within their power to put the breaks on. I understand the depth of their rage after what Hamas did, but they shouldn't soothe their sorrow with the blood of innocents

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Well said. The only angels here are the innocents being slaughtered. The belligerents are all devils.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Interesting that you mentioned the removal of Hamas from power but not the current Isreali government.

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (8 children)

If polling is accurate, they will be voted out soon enough. To remove Hamas one needs the ammo box, as they have removed the ballot box as an option.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The government of Israel is at least somewhat democratic. That makes removing it a bit more thorny than removing an organization like Hamas, because one either has to effectively just force an election there, which carries the risk that the same people (or people with the same ideology, if you forbid the specific people currently in power) might just win it and keep things the same, or replace the entire system with something that isn't democratic, which is generally viewed as a bad thing in itself. It's also move salvageable though for the same reason: there's little chance that someone wanting peace and resolution will somehow take over Hamas, it would be antithetical to what their organization even is, but the policies of a government like Isreal's at least have the potential to dramatically shift if people wanting those things take hold of it.

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure that can change, too. I don't live there, so it didn't come to mind. My desires mean nothing to anyone by me- but I want the violence to stop.

I can't imagine that the Israeli people so close to the border are just totally fine with what happened to the civilians and likely would want their government overhauled- but again, I don't live there. I only know what the media as told me, and I acknowledge that all that could even be a lie.

It's messy

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Indeed it is messy. But "removing" Hamas from power is about as easy as "removing" Bibi and his cabal from power. They feed off each other, and blame each other just enough to sway their populace into letting them stay in power.

The problem isn't as easily fixed as "just take Hamas... and put it over there".

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Bibi can be removed via an election. There literally does not exist a method of removing Hamas other than violence, either from the people of Gaza or an external force.

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 2 points 11 months ago

Never said it was.

I have no stakes in the game. Just an opinion

[–] ThankYouVeryMuch@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Every government should be removed from power

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's why you don't pick sides

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 3 points 11 months ago

For sure. It's hard to know what's true and what isn't. All we know is what the media tells us. Hopefully we'll know at some point

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

There's an infinite spectrum between "not shooting children" and "letting the other guy shoot yours"

Also, this "oh we're so much better and civilized" act really falls short when it has to be explained to you why shooting children is still bad even when you do it.

[–] yukichigai@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

False dilemma. There are ways to react that don't involve shooting children.

Even if there weren't, I wouldn't say "yeah shoot some children."

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

You're misrepresenting my position. It's, "yeah definitely shoot the terrorist, try to avoid shooting their hostages if you can."

[–] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

That isn't an option atm so just a pointless strawman being propped up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Makfreeman@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't proportionality be a thing here? Reprisals would be acceptable if they did not result in a disproportionate loss of innocent civilians. Unfortunately it seems like Palestinian children's lives are much cheaper than Israeli lives. I hate saying it because I think all children deserve protection regardless of the actions of the people in power, be it hamas or idf.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

Also the comparision isnt Palestinian children vs Israeli children. It is Palestinian children vs. grown armed men and women aka Soldiers.

Israel could have worked with insurgencies to target Hamas specifically, without having to bomb everything to rubble. That would have risked more soldiers lives though.

So they are weighting their soldiers lifes at a rate of about 200 Palestinains of which 80 are children.

For comparision. In WW2 about 4 Ally soldiers died for one civillian death in the Axis and about 6 Ally civillians, mostly Chinese, Polish, Ukranian and Russian, died for every Axis soldier. So the war of total annhilation, with death squads eradicating entire villages and concentration camps for mass murder still had a much lower rate of civillian to military deaths.

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

Well, didn't take long at all to find a new low.

load more comments (31 replies)