this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
34 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17683 readers
18 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
34
How does ActivityPub differ from what BlueSky is using? (AT) (lemmy.ca)
submitted 11 months ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I don't quite understand a lot of the details on how the implementations work.

In what ways is AT better or worse than ActivityPub? Are there different versions of ActivityPub? Are there improvements coming to either to make them better (or compatible)?

My current understanding is

  • AT makes it easier to move accounts (according to them), but AT is controlled and maintained by BlueSky, and they are a for-profit company that can mess with the protocol in the future, which goes against the central idea of decentralized social media

What other cool technical details are there?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Huh?

3 browsers that at the time of the browser wars had three different rendering engines?

3 social networks that at the time of the microblog wars run on three different protocols.

[โ€“] Feyter@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

Maybe it's a thing about analogies that they don't need to be 100% accurate. So I guess it's ok ๐Ÿ˜„