Sure, I can understand that. I think maybe I didn't explain myself particularly well. I was mostly referring to the discourse you tend to get online, including Lemmy, where any even vaguely positive climate/environment news is dog-piled by comments stating how it's not enough, won't work or is otherwise 'actually a bad thing™'.

We have been so saturated with negative news around climate change etc that anything to the contrary is misinterpreted as false. It's exhausting, and risks drowning any positivity and motivation under a torrent of defeatism. It also becomes a convenient scapegoat, facilitating the excuse of doing nothing under the guise of 'well, we're all doomed so why bother even trying?'. That isn't the kind of false reasoning we can afford to foster.

Im obviously not advocating that we bury our head in the sand and pretend everything is fine, but we do need more fairly balanced reporting to ensure that everyone stays informed, and that optimism and positivity can be used to encourage and motivate, rather than trying to replace that with fear, hopelessness and depression. Fuck knows there's enough of that about as it is.