this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
540 points (96.9% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3801 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump's campaign spokesman defended Trump using "vermin" to describe his enemies, while historians compared his language to Hitler, Mousselini.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're narrowly insisting on a verdict of criminal liability versus actual liability, which you aren't going to find in a civil case.

I am referring to actual responsibility. I have no reasonable doubt that Trump is a rapist. The jury found a Trump liable for rape, and the judge clarified that Trump is liable for rape.

No matter how much you like this guy, Trump was found to be a rapist.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I do not like the guy. I'm explaining that beyond a reasonable doubt may be something you feel is appropriate, but it's not because of the civil suit, because that's not the standard of evidence in a civil suit.

I'm comfortable saying he was a rapist way before the civil trial.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're still just repeating and agreeing with everybody else in this thread who's saying that this is a civil, not a criminal trial. I guess good job if that's what you're going for?

That is correct. This is a civil case. Not a criminal case.

The jurors, reasonably, do not doubt his liability of rape. The judge, reasonably, does not doubt that Trump is liable of rape.

You're just being precious about a term that is not exclusively used in jurisprudence.

Trump was found liable of rape beyond a reasonable doubt.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, you're being intentionally obtuse and awkwardly stubborn and nobody knows why but you.

Why use the exact same wording as a legal standard? You could have said "he's a rapist, without a shadow of a doubt" and we'd have all known what you meant. Instead you decide you're going to die on this weird ass ambiguous hill.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm thriving on this hill. Some of you are married to certain interpretations of common phrases, and that is just your neurosis.

Revel in it.

Trump, beyond a reasonable doubt or its shadow, is a rapist.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We can at least agree on that. He's also a massive piece of shit otherwise.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Being a massive piece of s*** is his forte.