World News

22057 readers

148 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Moderation / Rules of "news" community? (beehaw.org)

submitted 1 year ago by HeapOfDogs@beehaw.org to c/news@beehaw.org

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I can't seem to find anything in a sidebar or sticky thread that talks about the moderation / rules of the news community. I'm very interested in coming to this community to learn about news, but right now it seems whats being posted tends to be relatively low (lower?) quality.

Examples of common rules

Use the same titles as the article itself
No blog spam, link to the source
Political news, should go to the political community
No dupes of same topic

As an example, take a look at other news aggregators that focus on news.

My goal here isn't tell people what to do but its start a conversation on the topic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I would say that if it’s the same exact copy/link it’s one thing. Or doing something like HackerNews where you remove a post but put a pinned/top level comment explaining its a dupe, locking the post and here’s the source/original post and comments to keep discussion from being fragmented.

But there are times that different coverage of the same story can carry different insights and details. Which can be useful to gain a more complete picture.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But there are times that different coverage of the same story can carry different insights and details. Which can be useful to gain a more complete picture.

we try to strike a balance but i will note that so far this has mostly gone the way of "flooding the front page with several minimally distinct copies of the same story"

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Of course. And I think it’s worth stating you all do a good job there. Just wanted to point out there are times where the initial reports are lacking in detail or outright incorrect in the rush to be first to press. So some way of linking later threads/posts that aren’t minimally distinct, can really bring the quality up.

I know the mod tools are lacking so there’s also the “you gotta work with what you can” too

[–] ffmike@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Sure, no argument there. There's a choice to be made between "post the second story as a comment to the first one" and "post the second story a a separate topic". I'm in favor of the first approach to keep discussion in one spot, but it's not something I feel super-strongly about.