this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
55 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37699 readers
396 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
55
AI machines aren’t ‘hallucinating’. But their makers are | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The Guardian (amp.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago by exohuman@kbin.social to c/technology@beehaw.org
89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Tech CEOs want us to believe that generative AI will benefit humanity. They are kidding themselves

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

saying AI will ruin humanity’s existence or bring “disempowerment” of the species is a completely awful view that has no way of happening just simply due to the fact that its not profitable.

The economic incentives to churn out the next powerful beast as quickly as possible are obvious.

Making it safe costs extra, so that's gonna be a neglected concern for the same reason.

We also notice the resulting AIs are being studied after they are released, with sometimes surprising emergent capabilities.

So you would be right if we would approach the topic with a rational overhead view, but we don't.