this post was submitted on 03 May 2022
20 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34920 readers
143 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cryptobros gonna cryptobro

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catradora_Stalinism@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

okay? that really isn't the threat you think it is.

[–] overflow64@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

why is that socialists are always on the internet complaining about the horrible west instead of living in their utopia

[–] Catradora_Stalinism@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

because some of us aren't stupid and realize money is a problem. You can't just move to goddamn china. I swear you capitalists just like being ignorant or just in that mindset permanently

[–] rysiek@szmer.info 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Greed is a problem. Debt is a problem. Money... is a tool. One that enables them, but one that is also somewhat useful. As long as it's not an end in and of itself (which is, incidentally, exactly what capitalism is about, and exactly what cryptocurrencies are about, and that is exactly why I said cryptocurrencies are intrinsically capitalist).

Graeber's analysis is fascinating. In small communities (say, a village) until, say ~18th century, money was simply not needed for day-to-day stuff. In fact, it was notoriously difficult to get coins in large enough quantity to go about regular daily business (buying food, selling your wares, etc).

So people did what they always do in small, closely-knit communities: operated on credit. And in many of those communities every now and then (maybe once per year or six months, depending on the community) there was a reckoning, where people's credit was cleared against each other, and what was left to pay was paid in coin.

Actual money was used when a given transaction was happening with someone who was not from that community — a traveler, for example — as it was impossible to expect them to come to the reckoning or otherwise be around long enough to "balance the books" so to speak.

It's all sorts of more nuanced, of course, and Graeber goes into all that nuance. Really good read, and very much on-topic.

Anyway, can't wait for our friend to pontificate on how all of this is wrong and never happened and how Graeber — having done decades of scientific research both as an anthropologist and as an economist — has no clue what he's talking about. 🙂

[–] overflow64@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

an economist who doesn't even understand the difference between mainstream and austrian economists, how what was possible in the 18th century for tight-knit communities is not possible for modern day nation states and how even a left wing website admits that this is less an economics book and more propaganda

[–] rysiek@szmer.info 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

an economist who doesn’t even understand the difference between mainstream and austrian economists

You forgot your monocle emojo. Here, take mine: 🧐

[–] overflow64@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

if you're an economist I don't think it's that farfetched that you should know the beliefs of the most dominant school of economic thought especially considering your whole thing is criticizing them and any introductory material in the field would introduce you to their beliefs.

[–] rysiek@szmer.info 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think it's far fetched to assume, especially without having read any of his works, that Graeber doesn't know Austrian economics. 🤣

[–] overflow64@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

he gives ludwig von mises as an example of a mainstream economist so yeah it's clear he doesn't

[–] rysiek@szmer.info 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] overflow64@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] overflow64@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

then get the money and go to china and leave us capitalists alone

[–] Catradora_Stalinism@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No. And yes people can just "get money to move" my god you are worse than a republican. China has very strict immigration, and even then won't let foreigners into the CPC.

I can just join the communist parties here to annoy you and make your country the way it must be.

[–] overflow64@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

fuck off and go raise funds to bring about the glorious revolution and ruin your own country