this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
596 points (86.7% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3472 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deft@ttrpg.network 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nah different. Acid attacks are most normally done towards women as a form of punishment. Not intended to kill.

Obviously violence will happen. But why are you ever arguing to make the violence easier?

If there was one item you could remove from society that truthfully they don't need, and acid attacks wouldn't happen. Wouldn't you do that? Especially since acid attacks are so awful?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's one example, notably stabbings are higher in basically every other county by orders of magnitude.

It's no easier to get a gun than a car, one just happens to be easily and effectively tracked back to the owner.

If we're doing theoreticals that item would be ignorance.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

we aren't doing theoreticals? this is about guns.

so you agree then removing guns would help resolve America's issues with gun violence

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If there was one item you could remove from society that truthfully they don't need, and acid attacks wouldn't happen.

That sir is a theoretical, and notably not at all about gun violence as you stated it.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Bro, you offered a theoretical and I turned it on you. That doesn't make me a moron and honestly responding in such a way kinda makes it seem like you can't support your argument so instead you lash out.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Removing guns from society is not theoretical you dweeb

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It is because it is only theory at this point.

You've gone off the edge sir, regain your composure and we can try this again if you'd like but random insults and general asshole behavior ain't finna do it bud.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

lol fuck off get the hell off your high horse.

this is a practical solution, this is a practical conversation. using a theoretical about the parallel you (foolish) brought up doesn't change that shit especially when you dive into this comparison chemicals and substances are banned and illegal and that does make it harder to obtain and harm people with.

using a metaphor doesn't make a conversation metaphorical buddy.

guns should be banned or at least so heavily regulated moreso than now and your stupid little acid angle ain't the meat you think it is kiddo

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You should take your own advice bud.

I didn't bring up a theoretical you did.... I made a comparison Or arguably a metaphor.

Hey you got it, it's certainly closer to a metaphor than a theoretical as there are in fact more acid attacks in India than the US and honestly more than most other countries.

You mean the thing I advocate for and told you about exactly one comment ago?

Lol we're on the same page, don't be so angry you can't see the forest for the trees.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fuck off you're literally too stupid for this that's why everyone downvoted your idiocy buddy.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Still unreasonably mad even though you know I'm for reasonable gun control, neat. You just want to be mad it seems.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

lol classic accuse the guy of being mad sure bud

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All you've done for three comments is insult me, if that's not being unreasonably mad I'm not quite sure what is.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And gaslighting, you finna go for the trifecta of shitty Internet argument styles?

We're in agreement, what is your point at this point.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

lmfao fraud ass shut up. see how dumb it is to accuse someone of yelling or being mad? shut your shit up

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

lmfao fraud ass shut up.

No no, your clearly not mad and super level headed.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
[–] TheManyVoices@mastodon.social -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

@Madison420 @deft

A knife can kill one person per minute. An AR-15 can kill dozens within that same time.

It's a false equivalency fallacy.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not at all true, swords are still an execution method and I can guarantee you it doesn't take half a minute let alone a minute.

It isn't, but hyperbole is your path to tread if it makes you happy I suppose.

[–] TheManyVoices@mastodon.social -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

@Madison420

You are actually proposing that one idiot with a sword can slaughter dozens of people in less than a minute. LOL

It's time to turn off your video game and touch grass.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Correct sir, not only that but I can link you to Nazi and Japanese experiments on the subject of you've the stomach for it and the mods don't hammer me for nsflogwb.

[–] TheManyVoices@mastodon.social -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

@Madison420

You're obviously not willing to check facts, or you would have seen that I am not a "sir," merely by checking my profile. So forgive me for not believing someone's "promise" that they have Nazi propaganda (of all things) to back up their claims.

(Psst... Nazi experiments were never legit and never used actual Scientific Method. So quoting them doesn't do any good, anyway.)

I bet Elon misses you back on the Dead Bird site. You should go back and hang out with your buddies there.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Sir is a gender neutral honorific, but you're certainly welcome to be offended if that makes you feel better.

What does "Elon" have to do with anything? Like are you ok, you need help?