Asklemmy

43791 readers

1547 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

119

Deleted (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by IsThisLemmyOpen@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

175 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Deleted

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] vegivamp@feddit.nl 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This particular photo is shopped, but i think false-perspective Illusions might actually be a good path...

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

It's fine if the photo is either shopped or a false-perspective illusion. It could be even a drawing. The idea is that this sort of picture imposes a lot of barriers for the bot in question:

must be able to parse language
must be able to recognise objects in a picture, even out-of-proportion ones
must be able to guesstimate the size of those objects, based on nearby ones
must handle RW knowledge, as "X only fits Y if X is smaller than Y"
must handle hypothetical, unrealistic scenarios, as "what if there was a kitty this big?"

Each of those barriers decrease the likelihood of a bot being able to solve the question.