this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2022
23 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
32029 readers
1705 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not entirely sure "mutual agreement" makes sense? I would need to read more about it, but my feeling is that it is reasonable to have the sender of the message set the terms here.
Why would anyone want that? Is there a way to disable that?
This is fundamentally impossible thanks to the analog loophole. The receiver can always copy down the message to a notepad, or just remember it. Exposing this mutual agreement is staying honest and make sure that it is understood by everyone involved.
It is important to remember that disappearing messages (in any application) are only helpful for people who you trust currently. (And until the messages are deleted.)
There is another use case for disappearing messages: protection against domestic violence. If the violent partner checks the victim's device, seeing messages might incite an attack.
This is the same. You trust the recipient but don't wan the messages to be stored for a long time.
Sure, no question about it. Still, how the feature is designed matters, and I feel a design requiring both parties to consent to disappearing messages before they are enabled is bad design in this case.
One of the reasons why is: you might want to send some sensitive messages to someone while they are away/offline/unavailable. Being able to enable disappearing messages and then send what you need to send is quite important.
There's a 4chan-like site that has this "live" feature, it's really fun and honestly doesn't get old. There were people really bad at typing, but it wasn't such a big deal, and even better if you're chatting with friends.