this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
280 points (98.3% liked)

News

23310 readers
3785 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] msbeta1421@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago (6 children)

So basically,

  1. Banks will repossess vehicles to try and minimise losses
  2. Banks will not be able to sell those repossessed vehicles, resulting in losses
  3. Banks may become insolvent as they are unable to liquidate the vehicles
  4. Government steps in to bail them out

New vehicle prices are not in line with their actual value, so banks are making loans that aren’t covered by the collateral. This is shit management by the banking industry. If it’s impossible to get an auto loan then vehicle prices will eventually fall as supply stacks up. Banks are feeding this cycle by being unrealistic in these loan assessments.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But... But price only go up?
The sky daddy book of economics says price only ever goes up and concentrated wealth is a good thing

This is what my partner and I call a "state's right to what" problem. The centralized wealth says that centralizing wealth is good. Centralizing wealth is good for whom, Mr. Finance?

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  1. Government steps in to bail them out *with tax money taken from the people who couldn't pay their car note in the first place

So either banks make money or banks take money.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The people who couldn't pay their car note in the first place usually ain't the type making a shit ton of money. They probably pay little taxes if any.

[–] cor315@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So taking responsible people's money then.

[–] msbeta1421@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, yes and no. It’s grey like most things in life.

Banks and credit are a means to “grow the pie” by allowing us to factor in future value. Before banks and credit, the world was a zero sum game where one person only had because the other person had not.

They do serve a real purpose but are only valuable when properly managed.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah that isn't true. The world never ran on the mathusian nightmare. If it had everything would be gone by now. You see wild edible plants and wild edible animals. Also census numbers and tax revenues would have been stable. The people of the past had the same issues we had. They starved on fertile farm land, they had economic downturns, they had baby booms, farms would switch from high end cash products to cheap grains they could sustain themselves with and back again.

Banks aren't doing us some favor by being the engine of economic growth. Every bank you see has become a corny capitalism abomination that makes most of its money lending money to people who don't need it, government infusions, and fees. Even the things that you can point to like financing a home ignore that it is a disease that they helped cause and they are selling the cure to.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

4 probably won't happen. The mortgage bailouts were a bit of a special case, because the debt was rolled into securities and spread all over the place. To my knowledge there isn't a secondary market for auto loans, so the scope is limited to individual banks.

What may happen is the FDIC guarantees all deposits like they did with silicon valley bank, which is less bad than a full on bailout.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't they? You said it yourself, they will get bailed out. This is classic moral hazard. Once you remove risk of lose people will make decisions that are reckless.

[–] msbeta1421@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Consequences are necessary to curb reckless behaviour. That’s why the leaders of these entities should be punished separately.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They won't have to worry about selling the cars, some used car dealer will take them off their hands gladly. What the banks and the financiers will have to worry about is how to bundle all of that bad debt into CDOs. There's a movie about this I think.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No used car dealership is going to take a 2007 Chevy Cavalier for 35k and yet that loan was approved during COVID, and subsequently repo'd.

No dealer will ever unload that car without a huge loss.

It's the banks problem to sort out. Until they sell the car to a dealer - they don't lose much. It's all 'in the air' on the books. They have a 35k loan and (in theory) a 35k car.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

I cant imagine any reputable bank gave out a $35k loan on a $1200 car. That sounds like something a "buy here pay here" lot might so and they'll just repo the car then resell it again.

[–] jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 year ago

Don't forget people also not being able to go to work anymore potentially