this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
959 points (100.0% liked)

196

16503 readers
2280 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
959
Rule (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago by LesDeuxBonsYeux@sh.itjust.works to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
369 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FastAndBulbous@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just how though? How does this get agreed upon without some threat of violence or top down hierarchy.

[–] Black_Beard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Consensus. And those who don't agree are free to separate and do their own thing based on their own consensus.

If you can't get the consensus/consent of the people your ideas will impact, you have no right to execute on those ideas.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Cooperatives do that. Hippie communities did it to some degree. Elected politicians swearing on representing the people who voted for them, in principle, should do the same thing.

And you know what would be great? If the truly anarchist communities where this actually happened were left to their own devices instead of being interfered by big bad countries who are afraid of "communism"