this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
198 points (87.5% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
3535 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mahlzeit@feddit.de 118 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In his book Zero to One, entrepreneur and venture capitalist Peter Thiel argues that modern scientific innovation is no longer groundbreaking.

I wasted a click.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd argue that venture capitalists are the cause of lack of scientific breakthroughs.

[–] neutron@thelemmy.club 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are we going to hear about enshittification in academia, too? Ugh.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Enshittification is pump-and-dump for companies over years instead of stocks over days/months.

Academia's problems with replication and funding for null/negative results have been known about for a while and are a separate problem. I guess it could be argued that they're related in that maybe an academic's career shouldn't be based on the profit cycle of their institution.

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

And yet you saved me one; that's zero to one at least!

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I still wasted a click after reading this because I thought, "no way is this article on science dedicated to that Lizard Person".

And I was right, but only because it's not really an article, much less about science. It's more like a business experiment to find out if this particular LLM "author", which generates disconnected gobblygook, can save them significant CapEx over a more expensive AI model that would output articles with something more closely resembling a coherent thought process, or being written by a human.