this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
557 points (93.6% liked)

Memes

45653 readers
1323 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 107 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You know their answer will be that the homeless just need to work harder.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And "stop doing drugs" as if homeless people are the only drug users and the rich never use them.

[–] DaCookeyMonsta@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've started getting angry when people declare that they refuse to give money to people begging because they'll just use it on drugs. More because of how frequently it comes up.

They aren't obliged to help anyone but just assuming every homeless person is a drug addict is so condescending.

And even if they were they are still a person and the money they beg for will is some part contribute to feeding them. You can't subsist off of drugs.

I see the same people burn money on the dumbest shit but act like giving money to homeless people is a sin against God.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If a homeless person is going to use that money for drugs or alcohol, good. I would too if I was homeless and needed to forget it for a little while.

[–] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t give money to homeless people anymore.

I used to work near a shelter and I’d get chased and harassed for money, I got threatened and yelled at regularly, and I got mugged once. Now being around the homeless makes me incredibly uneasy.

I donate to food banks and the shelters, but no way am I ever giving some unaccountable homeless person cash. If they want my help they can go through the proper channels, I know many won’t, but I don’t have the tools to find or help those people.

[–] DaCookeyMonsta@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And you're not obliged to. There's nothing immoral about not going out of your way to help people especially at risk to yourself.

While they are people and should be treated with dignity and not like animals, they are still people and like any stranger can be dangerous and unpredictable, especially in desperation.

Not to mention at least near where I live about a third of the homeless are mentally ill due to the state's incapacity to care for such people.

It's similar where I live.

I feel bad mainly supporting the shelters because there are a lot of stories about people who go in and get robbed or assaulted and they avoid them after. They tend to build camps which get perennially torn down by the city/cops. I wish there was a better way to help those people.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The only reason not to give food, clothing, or cash is because I’m already late for work or I have nothing to spare right now. I try to find something even if it’s just a smoke or something.

[–] Zink@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago

Assuming those other people are all bad or at the very least less than the good people?

Using that as a reason to not help people? And love sharing it?

Using the same money on dumb wasteful shit for yourself?

I think the people you’re running into are just run of the mill conservatives.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you posting these links in reply to me because you think I am suggesting the homeless need to work harder?

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No just resources, if you had that conversation with a coworker.

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks, sorry for the misinterpretation!

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago
[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Luckily they unionized..

[–] pyromaster55@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Exactly that. Homelessness isn't a social issue that needs to be solved, it's the consequences of the unhomed's poor choices and absolutely nothing else.

Arguing with willful ignorance is fucking exhausting, you literally can't get them to see past their blind beliefs because most of them wear "you can't change my mind" like a badge of honor.

[–] pec@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

It is a social issue. People being incapable of taking care of themselves is inevitable. All civilizations had these issues. Families, churches and general generosity of neighbors have always been used to mitigate this.

Now with the wealth gap increasing and the individualistic philosophy in our society with not noticing and tending to these early on. We only notice once the person is a full blown junkie. Many needed help for a a short moment in life and could of become autonomous after, many are both permanently incapable of autonomy. Either way society have to deal with them. We have enough resources! For the price of just one of those opulent pick up we could probably shelter one person for 2-5 years.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago

Not so much willful ignorance as backwards reasoning. They desperately want to believe the world is fair and they earned whatever success they've had in their lives, so they adopt beliefs that lead to those conclusions.

I struggled with it a lot in my 20s. If you've grown up with the idea that the world is basically a pretty decent place, it's hard to accept how fucked up everything is, so there's a natural tendency to try to explain away the things you learn about so you don't have to confront the harsh reality directly.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it’s the consequences of the unhomed’s poor choices and absolutely nothing else.

Classical Liberal / Libertarian here and this is wrong. Life can be massively unfair / unkind and it's not unusual for people, even ones who make solid choices, to end up in bad situations.

What so many of my Libertarian fellows seem to miss is that we're allowed to have empathy. Do I want the Government taking my money to redistribute it? Absolutely not but that does not excuse us from acting on our own. In fact I'd argue we have MORE of an obligation for individual action to help those less fortunate.

Come at me.