this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
812 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37699 readers
368 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
812
All programs should tell you where they store config files (utcc.utoronto.ca)
submitted 1 year ago by wet_lettuce@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I wholeheartedly agree with this blog post. I believe someone on here yesterday was asking about config file locations and setting them manually. This is in the same vein. I can't tell you how many times a command line method for discovering the location of a config file would have saved me 30 minutes of googling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sharmat@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It would be amazing yeah, standardising all user config files in the $HOME, and maybe etc/ or an default, non usable, user profile to store the original versions, in case of a bad config or corrupted file would save so much time debugging stuff.

[–] daan@lemmy.vanoverloop.xyz 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like $XDG_CONFIG_HOME and $XDG_DATA_HOME?

[–] ddnomad@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago

Sadly, what we seem to have over and over is https://xkcd.com/927/

It’s getting better though

[–] BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GoboLinux kind of solved that problem but it hasn't been updated in years.

[–] neoney@lemmy.neoney.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

take a look at NixOS

[–] Sharmat@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Does the nix configuration file contain also the config files of the programs within it?

[–] acow@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mixed. Many folks use home-manager to configure their user environment with nix, and you can specify config files there. However, escape hatches to use regular files not managed by nix exist to make config tweaking faster. You can specify your config file contents in nix, which works well for server deployments, but for desktop use it usually ends up being a mix of seldom-changed config going in the nix definitions, and other things that, say, revolve around GUI tools for config tweaking (eg KDE apps) continuing to do their own thing.

[–] neoney@lemmy.neoney.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I haven't met one person who doesn't use home-manager. Maybe that's because most people I talk to use tiling window managers and stuff like that, where you define everything in text files.

You can see my config at https://github.com/n3oney/nixus.

PC, Laptop and aarch64 server configured in one place with shared components

[–] eleanor@social.hamington.net 5 points 1 year ago

The XDG Base Directory standard has kinda sorta been doing that; and I like it. Not everything supports it; and it's not perfect, but at least it's better than the wild west that application configs used to be.