this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2022
18 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

31173 readers
162 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] castarco@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I've seen Germany states jump into open source software strategies to later "regret" them and revert back to their previous state, many times... I hope this time they do it in a more thoughtful way, to avoid giving excuses to closed-source software lobbyists.

[–] nachtigall@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"regret" aka getting bribed by Microsoft. Or alternatively the personel being unwilling to adapt to changes.

[–] castarco@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Although plausible, and part of it, it's not just that. The second part is much more important (people unwilling to adapt), but one should think about why.

  • How sudden & drastic was the change?
  • How well trained were people?
  • How much support did they get when something went wrong?

That's the kind of stuff where companies & public administrations usually suck, "change management".

[–] poVoq 2 points 2 years ago

In Munich at least the "not invented here" syndrome also played a significant role, with them rolling their own Linux distribution and then not keeping it up to date, thus causing frustrations with users due to outdated software.