this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
54 points (82.9% liked)

politics

19170 readers
5255 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nineteen states have passed legislation to make daylight saving time permanent. But those laws won't take effect until Congress makes it legal. And the medical community sees one major problem.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Instead of making it so the sun is never overhead at noon again, couldn't we all just agree to do things an hour earlier? Surely its cheaper and less disruptive to global coordinated time keeping if we just ask Dolly to rerecord the song to be "8 to 4."

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

This is what drives me crazy. People act like it's impossible to just, I dunno, start work earlier during some seasons rather than passing an act of congress to officially change the clocks.

Once we all get used to the time shift any benefits will be lost. And people will be bitching about how dark it is in the winter in the morning.

[–] Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean you're not wrong, but its also a larger societal thing which ends up meaning government who negotiates such things. Its not just work, but school start times and bus schedules, public transport times, parking fees/times. It balloons out a bit, so its easier to have some official stance. However, it doesn't have to be federal, and could just be local municipal governments.

In general, though. Yes, individuals could just shift what they do, and this is exactly what humans did for a long time. The industrial revolution changed us so that we needed to coordinate and regiment societal schedules, and here we are now.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

However, it doesn't have to be federal, and could just be local municipal governments.

For the sake of sanity please no... I can only imagine a bunch of rural vs city splits where some county decides they should be in rooster time vs their neighbors.

[–] Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I agree it would be utter chaos! The idea that "why does it take an act of congress to change time" on the one hand sounds crazy, but I think what I'm trying to point out is why it takes an actual act of congress


we are coordinating lots of services and activities, and no one wants to descend back to the days of no one agreeing on noon!

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

You raise some good points. Though technically there are local regulations already. Most of Arizona, for instance, ignores DST. They have plenty of Sun - no need to save it...

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So much simpler before rigid timekeeping was a thing. Get up when a bird tells you to and when the shadows get long go back inside.

Unfortunately people tend to expect businesses to have consistent hours for the most part. I see in a lot of small town businesses where they have winter hours vs summer hours but those tend to be shops that only cater to the local population. Having some consistency across the board is a net good thing and I'd be great with just picking one and sticking to it though. It's not as though it actually changes the hours of daylight, just our perception of when they are anyhow.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Changing routines like that would be a major pain in the ass.

I’d much rather change the clocks than try to retrain my entire routine twice a year.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean.. You do retrain your routine twice a year when the clocks change. If it weren't for that you could do it more gradually to make it easier. Maybe 15 mins earlier/later a day.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not really. My routine doesn’t change based on the clock, which is what matters. The same things happen at the same time every day. The time might be shifted, but it still occurs at the same clock time. If the clock time doesn’t shift, then you have to consciously remember things that used to start at 9 now start at 8, which results in a lot more confusion and disruption of schedule

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have to remember that the clocks change. How is that different to having to remember things start at 8 now?

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

My clocks all change automatically. My internal clock is so fucked up that it doesn’t matter. There’s pretty much no manual intervention at all anymore and that works out great.

Changing starting times gets the worst of both worlds. Now everything (and I literally mean everything) is at a different time than it was a day before. Times for medications, times for pet feeding, times for work and the list just keeps getting longer.

At least with the system we have now the clock time of everything doesn’t change.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

I see - you mean "the things you think about" don't change. I meant your routine changes in that you shift "when" you get up each day when the clocks change.

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I've lived in a country that does not change for almost a decade now. It feels great to not have to deal with it (well, mostly; it affects scheduling calls with family in the US)

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every work an overnight shift? Everyone I know who does it ends up switching to "normal" hours on weekend just because all their friends and family live normal hours. Normally you sleep when everyone else is eating lunch, so every holiday you are switching to a normal schedule. Even if you try to keep the same schedule, almost nothing is open at 2am so you can't do any shopping on your weekend if you don't switch to follow the local world.

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

And then daylight savings rolls around and if you happen to be on shift you work an extra hour for free.

[–] mriguy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Once we all get used to the time shift any benefits will be lost. And people will be bitching about how dark it is in the winter in the morning.

Yup. You know how we know that? Because they did this in 1973, and it lasted 10 months before people realized it was stupid idea and repealed the law.

Despite living in a time where all human knowledge is available in everybody’s palm, people demand action because they are inconvenienced rather than taking 5 minutes to understand why things are as they are.

The earth is tipped on its axis, and as a result, the days getter shorter and longer throughout the year. We change the clocks as a way of dealing with this, not because the government is stupid and wants to make everybody's life miserable. The biannual time change is irritating, but it’s better than not doing it. But I guess every 50 years people have to relearn this.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I grew up in Indiana and, until the 2010s (I think), Indiana did not have DST. I don't remember it ever being an issue or an inconvenience.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd take "3 to 11" and just use GMT. Then none of these bickering parties have a leg to stand on anymore.

[–] Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It makes the same problem though. You create some abstraction layer of "at 3 I start work". You then travel somewhere else, and you have to shift your abstraction layer again to "at 8 I start work"


or you ask "but its 3 at office X, why aren't they at work?" and then still need to shift mental times to figure out when local day/night is.

The local noon system works to ease the local abstraction shift, but makes it harder to jump to absolute times.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No mate haha... everyone uses GMT. That's the goal. No more time zones. You don't have to plan when going to another location, it's the same time everywhere. If I gotta call someone on the other side of the world, it may be dark where they are and light where I am, but it's still 4 o'clock. That's the beauty of it.

No more time zone translation, do they use time changes, if they do, which one? That's all over. You could even get rid of AM and PM and use military time so there no more confusion at all.

Yes, it would require us to get used to saying I'm working at 7 pm when it would normally be 2 pm local but that's nothing compared to the dance we're doing right now and once you've adjusted, it's done for good. How much productivity is lost when people miss phone calls or meetings because of the disparity?

Hell, I've even missed BUSINESS FLIGHTS because of this stuff and I'm not alone.

[–] Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I completely understand what you're saying. It works for synchronizing well as things run on an absolute time. However, you are still going to do a localization shift, and you end right back up with time zones.

In your example, you work at 1500. Cool. I need to coordinate with Bob from Bulgaria. Its also 1500 there. Is he working? Who knows. I need to get out ye old solar map and find out. Or, I'm flying to Tokyo. My body is going to follow its diurnal cycle and want to wake up when the sun rises. We are still going to have a local abstraction of what the day hours are that shift with respect to longitude. A universal time doesn't get rid of that. I agree that flight coordinating would be easier. But, if I know I want to arrive somewhere in the morning, right now I sort by AM arrival, and boom I'm done. In a UTC system, I now have to go look up the solar morning hours for my destination sort by time, find the window I want to arrive in, and then I can be good. I still might not have a good sense of what is super early versus what is closer to middle of the day.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only issue I have with that is the date change at a reasonable hour. Especially since in California it would happen during standard business hours

[–] ares35@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

at the dmv:

"your license is expired. you have to retake the exam"

it wasn't when i got in line

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Wait does your state not have a grace period for that. Mine is quite long. You have 6 months of “It’s expired but we know you probably don’t check this often, so it’s fine if you fix it quickly”

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Why is it so important that the sun is directly overhead at noon?

First of all, the sun is rarely directly overhead at noon anymore, even during standard time, because we use the same time for all the time in the time zone, so the sun is only directly overhead at noon if you are in the center of the time zone. (And even then, the sun is not always overhead at noon all the time- see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time )

Have you ever noticed that the sun is never directly overhead at noon, even when you think it should be? I doubt it.

Second of all, Noon is no longer mid-day anyway. The vast majority of people are awake for fewer hours before noon than after noon.

Permanent DST basically means that we are now considering 1PM to be mid-day, which is more compatible with most people's schedules.

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I want to point out that solar noon is the term to describe when the sun reaches its highest point in the sky.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because that's what noon means. There should at least be a chance.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Noon hasn't meant that the sun is directly overhead since November 18, 1883.

https://guides.loc.gov/this-month-in-business-history/november/day-of-two-noons

And technically, Ptolemy knew in the 2nd century that mean solar time and apparent solar time were different, so you could argue we have known it for nearly 1900 years.

[–] BaldProphet@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the Northern Hemisphere, one can always expect the sun to be somewhat south of overhead at noontime. The close to the equator you live, the more directly overhead it will be.

The tropics is the only area on Earth where the Sun will ever be directly overhead. The sun's average position is directly over the equator and the wobble in the Earth's rotation let's it's absolute position vary about 23.5° north or south which is what defines the tropics.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

What is important isn't that the sun is directly overhead, just that it is "close" to overhead. Wherever you live you plan your day around the sun. Sure we have lights, and if you never go outside they are fine - but most people would agree that is a terrible life: once you accept you will go outside once in a while you want the times you go outside to be when the sun is up if possible (except astronomers who what nobody else to have those artificial lights on when it should be dark)

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So, instead of changing the clocks in the spring, we're going to start work an hour early? So we're adjusting our schedule instead of our clocks? How the fuck is that any different?

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe it wouldn't cost hundreds of millions of dollars and kill people.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hahahahaha!

Oh, maybe you're not joking? Have you heard about this thing people do called war? Maybe we souldn't spend hundreds of millions of dollars and kill people?

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago

What does war have to do with the fact that every time we change the clocks it costs our economy about $350 billion dollars in lost productivity and kills about ~1,500 people due to increase cardiovascular stress?

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stores already do this by closing earlier after DST ends. It's currently a double fucked shift. It needs to be simplified.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

If they're changing hours in the spring and fall, it's because you live in a tourist town. Can't blame the clocks for that, unfortunately.