this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
114 points (99.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43908 readers
1049 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 115 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Here's the specific bit relavent to OP's question:

VAWTs often suffer from dynamic stall of the blades as the angle of attack varies rapidly.

The blades of a VAWT are fatigue-prone due to the wide variation in applied forces during each rotation. The vertically oriented blades can twist and bend during each turn, shortening their usable lifetimes.

Other than the drag-types, VAWTs have proven less reliable than HAWTs,[20] although modern designs have overcome many early issues.

VAWT = vertical axis wind turbine

HAWT = horizontal ...

[โ€“] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[โ€“] LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Horizontal Axis WInd Turbines. So HAWT right now

So take off all your clothes!

Best Hot In Herre video: https://youtu.be/XNGjSll2_Uc?feature=shared

[โ€“] Raxiel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I don't know why, the big fan is on

[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago

So TL;DR it's worth the extra bearing for the added efficiency unidirectional wind flow allows.