Literature

5414 readers

67 users here now

Pretty straightforward: books and literature of all stripes can be discussed here.

If you're interested in posting your own writing, formal or informal, check out the Writing community!

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

Kamirose@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

Is there a tendency to regard books which make us feel bad as "better" than ones which don't? (beehaw.org)

submitted 1 year ago by emma@beehaw.org to c/literature@beehaw.org

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm dragging myself through an "award-winning" "best-selling" "recommended" book I got from the library and wishing I hadn't. (Yes I know those phrases mean little and I can stop, though I'm nearing the end after hoping it would stop being so hopeless. Yes I can be naively optimistic ;) .) The characters and story are all stereotypes and clichés. It's not realistic or slice of life.
The Korean drama I'm watching is top rated on MyDramaList and is well done but it also tells a sad story every episode. I'm halfway through and I don't think it's that much better than some lower rated ones with more moments of happiness.
Anyway, this has me thinking about whether there's a general trend to regard books - stories of any kind really, including real life ones - as "better" if they upset us.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] emma@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It wasn't a literary novel which inspired my post. Reading not an "approved" hobby? I suppose they wouldn't approve of Oscar Wilde or even Jane Austen then.

All of this about a "certain demographic in the US" feels very culture war and it's drive towards the negative so I'd best stay schtum rather than walk into one of those.

[–] VoxAdActa@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I tried to be as oblique as possible, given that my sample size, no matter how big it seems to me, is very small; only 40-50 people out of 350,000,000, though a large number of local news broadcasts back in the day decrying the trend of adults reading "children's books" in their spare time may mean something (or it may not).

But yes, you're right: The complaints/disdain have come exclusively from one specific generational demographic (if the bit about my ex-wife was confusing, she's more than a decade older than me). Maybe I just haven't met the Gen Zs who are actively upset that grown-ups are reading novels other than "the classics", period pieces (specifically romances), and westerns. They very well could be out there in incredible, unfathomable numbers, spoiling the pattern that I believe I have seen based on my limited worldview.

So please, feel free to offer your own competing explanation for why fanciful and enjoyable books are so frequently snubbed by reviewers, etc., and why the "best" books are the ones that range from super sad to borderline unreadable experiments in frustrating your publisher's typesetter.

[–] emma@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I don't have a "competing explanation", except that it's not likely to be as simple as laying it on a particular demographic or certain professions. Very little ever is.

Read back, I asked a question - is there a trend/tendency towards. Everyone who's responded has gone straight to reasons why.

I'm also not inclined towards your snarky extremes, equating fanciful and enjoyable and setting them against the saddest and hardest to read.