this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
49 points (87.7% liked)

Technology

59381 readers
4262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
49
The Future of Machine Learning: A New Breakthrough Technique (MLC) (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by A_A@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Breakthrough Technique: Meta-learning for Compositionality

Original :
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06668-3

Vulgarization :
https://scitechdaily.com/the-future-of-machine-learning-a-new-breakthrough-technique/

How MLC Works
In exploring the possibility of bolstering compositional learning in neural networks, the researchers created MLC, a novel learning procedure in which a neural network is continuously updated to improve its skills over a series of episodes. In an episode, MLC receives a new word and is asked to use it compositionally—for instance, to take the word “jump” and then create new word combinations, such as “jump twice” or “jump around right twice.” MLC then receives a new episode that features a different word, and so on, each time improving the network’s compositional skills.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Traditional deep neural network’s training requires millions of example and so, despite its great success, is immensely inefficient.

Is this a limited advancement in training techniques? Right now I'm working on several types of image classification models. How would this be able to help me?

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sorry, I just read a lot... but I don't work in this field.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you don't really understand it, why do you believe this is so big?

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am not sure what "image classification models" incompasses. I would have to read more and understand and I don't have enough time and energy.
Yet in the past I have read and understand a few books about neural networks and this new article in nature is something else : it's clear when reading it.
( also to @TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world )

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I mean is this any different than standard gradient descent with something like Adam as optimiser.

That's my assumption based on the headline. But the quick skim I gave the article seemed to only discuss it in the context of NLP. Not exactly my field of study.

[–] QueriesQueried@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~Admittedly, they were quoting someone else in the message you responded to. That may have been edited after the fact, but the person they're quoting did in fact say those words ("this is big").~~

It was I who couldn't read, as that is not what happened.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Based on your reading, swag?