this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
553 points (96.9% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2636 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thou shalt not kill people. They don’t consider Palestinians people.

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Actually the commandment is, "Thou Shalt Not Kill." The first and foremost commandment that God gave to his people. I'm not religious at all (actually atheistic) but, that commandment does not carry with it any exceptions. Sure people would naturally defend themselves when assaulted, who wouldn't - but that doesn't mean you can ever be redeemed afterward. Just the opposite. Even Moses was disbarred from heaven for killing an Egyptian who was whipping a slave. God means it when he hands down that commandment; it applies to everyone.

[–] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s not the way people interpret it. The majority of religious extremism directly contradicts scriptures. This is still the justification used

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I know, I live in a state with major religious extremism. I'm well aware how they bend scriptures to suit their need to justify everything.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't speak Hebrew but I've been told the original language is more like "thou shalt not murder". That leaves a lot of wiggle room, but "thou shalt not kill" has problems as well—like it could be taken as mandating veganism.

In the end I don't think it matters how the hairs are split—people are gonna interpret it to mean whatever they want it to mean.

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

That's a good point. I think someone pointed out that in Leviticus it technically could be interpreted we aren't even allowed to step on insects or else be damned for it. Not that we should want to step on insects, but who hasn't done that at some point.

[–] steventhedev@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh - I appreciate the clarification. It shows I really am not well-educated in religious stuff. Still I wonder how such a commandment can be wiggled around, to me it doesn't leave any room for other interpretations.

[–] steventhedev@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The main arguments for wiggling around it are based on balancing multiple lives against one. There's a ton of commentary that are basically trolley problem examples. So self-defense is ok, intent matters, etc. Very similar to how most Western legal codes (quite possibly more, I'm just less familiar) distinguish between manslaughter, murder in the moment, planned murder, etc.

Keep in mind it is a religious text, so it obviously also carves out a bunch of stuff around killing for the purpose of enforcing laws (capital punishment), warfare, etc.

I would not be surprised if there's something in there about how it's ok to kill people who tie their shoes the wrong way.

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think most religious texts could be interpreted to support anyone's need to justify brutality toward others somehow. I would hope that human conscientiousness and empathy would prevail and keep people from ever wanting to hurt each other, but that's just not the reality we live in. It kind of scares me how people tie themselves into pretzel-knots of justification for their horrible actions. But I truly believe - bible or not - killing is always wrong no matter what the reason someone uses for it. Hey that's just me, but...I'm glad I am that way.

[–] steventhedev@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Hey that’s just me, but…I’m glad I am that way.

I hope you stay that way. I lost most of my faith in humanity at some point, and what little was left is gone after October 7th.