this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
252 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
2970 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Researchers have devised an attack that forces Apple’s Safari browser to divulge passwords, Gmail message content, and other secrets by exploiting a side channel vulnerability in the A- and M-series CPUs running modern iOS and macOS devices.

iLeakage, as the academic researchers have named the attack, is practical and requires minimal resources to carry out. It does, however, require extensive reverse-engineering of Apple hardware and significant expertise in exploiting a class of vulnerability known as a side channel, which leaks secrets based on clues left in electromagnetic emanations, data caches, or other manifestations of a targeted system. The side channel in this case is speculative execution, a performance enhancement feature found in modern CPUs that has formed the basis of a wide corpus of attacks in recent years. The nearly endless stream of exploit variants has left chip makers—primarily Intel and, to a lesser extent, AMD—scrambling to devise mitigations.

. . .

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stop trying to force catchy names, researchers.

From someone who works regularly with vulnerability management, it's actually needed.

Vulnerabilities have really boring numbers and it's difficult for humans to discuss them in a meaningful way. I believe the first vulnerability to get a "name" was heartbleed, the theory being that with a name people would take it seriously and discuss it properly. Given the severity of this vulnerability, it probably got a name but since it's being patched by the vendors affected, it was probably not needed.

Heartbleed was needed because individual web sites had to update their software immediately or have their traffic intercepted.

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I hear you, fair point. I can't recall CVE numbers off the top of my head either.
Heartbleed was also a great name, whereas iLeakage is... a choice.

I'll probably be referring to it as 'the latest Safari security failure', hopefully they can ensure that description stays relevant for a few weeks.