I've been informed that adblock plus sort of sucks now. If you're looking for one, go for UBlock Origin.
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
1235 points (95.0% liked)
memes
10398 readers
3178 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Imagine shilling a closed source, sold out alternative to UBlock Origin
I'm not an expert on these and didn't realize there was a difference. Did this one sell out?
Yes, they allow certain "non-obtrusive" ads by default. Some people might be fine with this, but it should absolutely be opt-in, and their deal with an ad company is the only reason it's the default.
I miss non obtrusive adds, remember when add blockers weren't a thing and we were all fine with the adds in the sidebar trying to sell us virus laden glittery custom mouse cursors? Instead we have an arms race where the net is essentially unuseable without an add blocker.
I'm guessing you missed the time period where opening the wrong page would give you an infinite loop of un-closeable pop-up windows with background music.
Ads were never really non-obtrusive. If advertisers could force you to listen to their slogan at max volume every time you opened your browser, they would do so without hesitation. If you ever saw an easily avoidable ad in the late 90s-early 00s, it wasn't for lack of trying. They simply hadn't personally figured out more annoying methods yet.
Now we're graced with its spiritual successor - the full-screen browser tab that looks like an "antivirus" warning designed to freak people out and get them to call the 800 number to grant remote access to "fix" the virus.
Or those flash-based "shoot the mosquito" ads that played a buzzing noise, at a time where your browser didn't highlight tabs playing media.
Agreed. Flash. 🤦♂️. Keep that one in the annals of history please.
What magical era is this? Because the before-adblocker time I remember was a hellscape of pop-over popups, sometimes many of them from opening a single web page.
.... ah, those were the days, of flash player ads that would grind your system to a halt with anti-aliased particle spam, minigames, and perhaps a virus too.
Or the sneaky, stealthy, cpu grinding carpet bomb of the pop-under ads, only visible after you close the browsing window.
It's become even worse since mobile became dominant.
Now the ads are no longer a bit of text or a gif, but full page shit covering the top half of what you want to see and stubbornly staying in place even as you scroll. The bottom half of the screen is a sea of cookie and data consent forms who's only interest is in making you agree out of sheer frustration.
And this is fuelled by bullshit, clickbait driven sites that use 10 paragraphs of useless AI generated padding with ads in between, to resist telling you what you went there to find out.
Google has destroyed the usability of the internet, and if it wasn't them it would have been some other greedy fuckers.
Some of the first ads on the Internet were pop-ups. Ads always sucked.
The worst part is, I still want those crazy cursors
No, I remember hating those banner ads.
Carbon Ads does non-intrusive ads very well
Well that blows. Thanks for the heads up. This is why we can't have nice things.
Unless I heard wrong, I was under the impression that to be considered "non-intrusive" all the ad company had to do was pay adblock Plus.
Ublock Origin is king
No, they need to obey to a specific standard. I think money may be involved but you need also to make sure that ads are non intrusive
it's both: https://adblockplus.org/en/about#monetization
Not only did Adblock Plus sell out, the maker of the real program everybody should be using, uBlock Origin, doesn't even accept donations.
A tale of 3 adblockers
ABP allows "acceptable" ads that are acceptable insofar as they meet certain standards one of which is paying them money effectively renting your eyeballs to advertisers.
Ublock Origin: A powerful and performant ad blocker by its creator
Ublock. After the above dev tried to pass the torch to the loser who now controls this he instantly edited information removing all information about the person who actually created it and fund raise off it to the point where the original dev renamed his fork of his own work Ublock origin after it was taken down on behalf of the scumbag who now runs ublock.
In short there is no reason to use anything but Ublock origin
sold out like 12 friggin years ago too. it's not like it's recent news.
(btw abp is in fact open source and licensed under GPLv3, but that doesn't make it any less sketchy sith their "Acceptable Ads" program)
ABP is definitely not closed source.
You can disagree with the whole "acceptable ads" debacle (I did and switched to unlock origin) but ABP is far from a risk to anyone using it. There's just better blockers out there.
I thought that was the joke, but I guess not. The joke being that Billy is about to give money to a horrible company.