this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
70 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37727 readers
671 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemillionsocks@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know its kind of surprising it took this long for someone to challenge it, but then again in this case the defendant isnt a major entertainment or recording company.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, the fiscal position of the streaming industry was not favorable compared to the copyright lobby's a decade ago. Things are probably a bit more balanced now.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still a bite the hands that feed them proposition. Unless there are anti-trust laws forcing the RIAA members to sell on all platforms, they could pull songs from any one service, and seriously damage the user base.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago