No you don't understand, the machine works exactly like a human brain! That makes stealing the work of others completely justifiable and not even really theft!

/s, bc apparently this community has a bunch of dumbass tech bros that genuinely think this

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This but mostly unironically. And before you go Inzulting me I'm an artist myself and wouldn't be where I am if I wasn't allowed to learn from other people's art to teach myself.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having a masters degree in machine learning doesn't make you an artist grow tf up xD

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

No, but drawing for last 13 years of my life does.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

don't dismiss me, I like being spit on

[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And this, is a strawman. If this argument is being made, it's most likely because of their own misunderstanding of the subject. They are most likely trying to make the argument that the way biological neural networks and artificial neural networks 'learn' is similar. Which is true to a certain extent since one is derived from the other. There's a legitimate argument to be made that this inherently provides transformation, and it's exceptionally easy to see that in most unguided prompts.

I haven't seen your version of this argument being spoken around here at all. In fact it feels like a personal interpretation of someone who did not understand what someone else was trying to communicate to them. A shame to imply that's an argument people are regularly making.