this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
108 points (89.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43939 readers
457 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yeah, no.

This is bullshit.

(Especially the stuff about brain plasticity and learning capacity)

https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/publishing/review/30/neural-plasticity-dont-fall-for-hype/

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you please just edit and rephrase so its obvious as to what direction you are indicatingn in terms of BS?

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but just to be clear, it's about the brain plasticity and diminishing returns. That stuff just isn't true.

Here's what the British academy has to say on the subject:

https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/publishing/review/30/neural-plasticity-dont-fall-for-hype/

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Sounds like you’re agreeing with GP that “it’s all babble”.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That example about London cabbies is actually one of my favorite studies...

But changes to certain structures in the brain isn't what I was talking about. And I've never heard of that being categorized as neuroplasticity.

Which makes it even weirder that the article is about how we should differentiate more.

So let's stay specific?

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2021.666851/full

[–] ArcticDagger@feddit.dk 4 points 1 year ago

But that study was done on people aged 65+ for 11 weeks? I mean, sure, they didn't measure any significant changes to the brain, but that doesn't preclude changes forever. 11 weeks is not long to practice a language