Asklemmy

43939 readers

384 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Why do so many mobile versions of sites run worse on phone than desktop versions? (sffa.community)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Hyggyldy@sffa.community to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I swear every mobile site is absolute garbage that runs like ass on phones.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DeadlineX@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or a junior dev implemented it and somehow it passed code review. Then when it was tested by the dev on localhost, it ran great. Then when (if) it hit qa, it was ran on local servers and worked fine.

A lot of things slip through the cracks. That’s what hot fixes and patches are for. It happens.

[–] FARTYSHARTBLAST@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume they even use QA

[–] DeadlineX@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

lol I did say if. Some of us still have QA!