Linux

48083 readers

746 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Experiences using immutable Linux desktops? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 year ago by wolf@lemmy.zip to c/linux@lemmy.ml

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am playing around with Fedora Silverblue and openSUSE Aeon and I really like the painless updates.

Still, my daily driver for some years now is Debian, and I have a decent setup via Ansible - everything just works for me.

My question is mostly to long term Linux users, which use Linux in a professional context and jumped from a distribution like Fedora, Ubuntu, openSUSE or Debian to NixOS, Silverblue, Aeon etc.

What is your experience? How did your workflows change on your immutable Linux distribution? Did you try immutable and went back to a more traditional distribution - why? How long are you running the immutable distribution and what issues and perks did you run into?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there's no flatpak

[–] snake@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Knowing such basic tools are missing makes me quite averse to trying it :/

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

You can still install most packages, it's just more steps. Look up "silverblue rpm-ostree overlaying"

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

It feels a bit like a phone OS, which is kinda awesome and horrible at the same time. It has gnome disks (or whatever is called, the default gnome partitioner) as an ok alternative to gparted. I have it installed on an old laptop that i occasionally use for web browsing and other light tasks, and for that it's great. I wouldn't use it for anything serious, but it's great if you want just a basic, no maintenance OS.

[–] j0rge@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course you can install gparted, you can run just about anything that you want, it's still Linux.

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I know but it kinda feels wrong haha. I like to use it flatpak only.