this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
148 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
2869 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Starkstruck@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it really the government's job to police what every teen does on the Internet though? I think that's for the parents to do.

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is the parents job, but what do you do when the parents don't do that job?

[–] Starkstruck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a lot of things parents should be doing but some don't. That however is a whole different argument.

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's my point. A parent should keep a child out of a fire, right? If they don't, do we as a society let the child burn because it was unlucky enough to have crappy parents?

[–] artisanrox@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'd be perfectly happy with this answer if the only states proposing this "for the children!" nonsense weren't deep red racist bigot states that want ro police women across state borders.

If red states are doing something I want to do the opposite.

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 1 points 1 year ago

When it comes to the big corporate platforms, yes.

When it comes to the Fediverse, no.