this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
533 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59232 readers
3756 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

NY bill would require a criminal history background check for the purchase of a 3D printer::Requires a criminal history background check for the purchase of a three-dimensional printer capable of creating firearms; prohibits sale to a person who would be disqualified on the basis of criminal history from being granted a license to possess a firearm.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Is this what the democrats think is important legislation right now?

You can make a firearm in a shitty garage shop way cheaper than the both monetary investment and time investment that comes with using a 3D printer.

People in fuckinh prisons make improvised firearms

This is a waste of time.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not about making firearms. It's about being able to make literally anything else, the ability to do so being something that would liberate individuals, to some extent, from the capitalist system. That's what they really don't want.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Uh, I'm pretty sure this is about firearms.

[–] docmark@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes and voter literacy tests were about making sure people were smart enough to vote. /s

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

You're right. This is definitely about protecting the US service economy from people manufacturing their own plastic trinkets. /s Just to be clear: I think this is a stupid bill, but it absolutely tracks with concern/hysteria around 'ghost guns'. No need to consult the tea leaves to figure this one out.

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they didn't want people having firearms, by golly there's some lower hanging fruit.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

This is correct. Although I'm not sure what the actual viability of using a 3d printer for cutting the costs of living in society is. From my understanding you can only kind of recycle proper 3d printer grade PLA plastic and you definitely can't make 3d printer plastic out of trash. Machine tools on the other hand can accomplish many of the same things and a greater percentage of the stuff that goes with them can be made out of trash or scrap.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You can recycle PET bottles, you probably don't use enough PLA packing to be effectively able to recycle it even if it weren't degraded.

Meh. 3D printer plastic goes for like $24 a pound on Amazon whereas almost everything you buy costs hundreds and is disposable largely because their cheap, shitty plastic frames aren't repairable. Being able to 3D print your own frames for electronics or tools or machines would save you so much money in the long run.

But the powers that be don't want that. That's the real reason why they've had it out for 3D printers. Printing guns is just an excuse.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

True.

But a milling machine (not even a CNC) costs and weighs more than a car.