this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
156 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39041 readers
3259 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russia appears to have launched a “renewed offensive” against Ukrainian troops in the eastern part of the country as the war inches closer to entering its second winter, National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby said on Friday.

But Russian troops haven’t made much progress, Kirby said, adding that the new attacks are “not a surprise.”

“The Russian military appears to be using human wave tactics where they throw masses of poorly trained soldiers right into the battlefield without proper equipment, and apparently without proper training and preparation,” he said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The difference, comrad, is that Ukraine cares about preserving formation, so they don't charge blindly ahead. Russia doesn't give a shit, if they have to refill their "elite" VDV formation three times over with mobiks, they'll gladly do so. Their literal purpose is soak up bullets from Ukrainian strongpoints, so someone else can fire a couple of North Korean artillery shells at it.

Obviously the latter method is great for gaining ground, in the short term. The former method is a lot more useful if you're assuming the war will last longer than 3 days.

Also: Sources please.

[–] Kualk@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago

Have your facts in check.

New York Times:

After Suffering Heavy Losses, Ukrainians Paused to Rethink Strategy Early in the counteroffensive, Ukraine lost as much as 20 percent of its weapons and armor. The rate dropped as the campaign slowed and commanders shifted tactics.

July 15, 2023

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/15/us/politics/ukraine-leopards-bradleys-counteroffensive.html

[–] Kualk@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago

October 14, 2023

Source: https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/19015889/amp

Ukraine called all men and all draftable women to show up at military draft tracking locations.

That’s my loose translation.

Reason: allegedly to improve tracking of people.

My opinion: to replenish losses after disastrous summer counteroffensive.

[–] Kualk@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Putin Reveals How Many Russian Troops Have Been Killed in Counteroffensive

Hilariously reliable source you've got there.

[–] Kualk@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Time magazine

Ukraine Is in Worse Shape than You Think

https://time.com/6176748/ukraine-war-economy/

I could find non-English reports that personnel in some military units have been changed completely several times in Ukraine.

Some western leaders stated loss numbers far exceeding official Ukrainian losses.

Would you believe any data I quote?

So, there is no point for me to waste my time.

The downvote numbers clearly indicate the desire to hide this information.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The downvotes are probably because you're not smart enough to combine all your links into one post. They're also partly because your links suck.

1: Newsweek is a US conservative magazine. They're famous for not having used factcheckers in the past 30 years, and the US conservative movement is heavily influenced by Russia. I wouldn't believe them if they told me the sky is blue.

2: the link from the Time is a year and a half old, and completely irrelevant to the current situation. It was 1 months into the war, and it was before the Kyiv attack was shattered, for example, or Russia pushed back to the Dnipro.

3: the NYT article basically says "after suffering casualties in one attack, AFU have changed their strategy". After those changes, the advance in the Robotyne and Novosilka areas was made.

None of that is "Ukraine is about to lose the war" material. Nor is Ukraine winning any time soon, that much is true.